Comparative effectiveness of early-targeted use of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin among hospitalized veterans' affairs patients with infections due to Clostridioides difficile.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare real-world effectiveness outcomes between hospitalized patients with Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) who received early-targeted fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin at two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed among hospitalized patients at two VAMCs from January 2008 until July 2017. SETTING: Albany and Syracuse VAMCs. PATIENTS: Patients were included in this analysis if they were age ≥18 years; were hospitalized; had a CDI with a Hines Severity Score Index (SSI) ≥2; received oral vancomycin (January 2008-June 2014 at Albany or Syracuse VAMCs) or fidaxomicin (March 2012-July 2017 at Albany VAMC) within 5 days of positive CDI stool sample for ≥ 48 hours. INTERVENTION: Receipt of an oral vancomycin- or fidaxomicin-containing CDI regimen. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality and 60-day recurrence. MAIN RESULTS: The study included 54 oral vancomycin and 38 fidaxomicin recipients. The population was predominantly male (97.8%), and mean ± standard deviation age was 74.6 ± 11.1 years. The composite outcome was significantly different between fidaxomicin and vancomycin recipients (26.3% fidaxomicin vs. 51.9% vancomycin; odds ratio (OR): 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.81, p = 0.01). This finding was maintained in the multivariate analysis after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.73, p = 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: This real-world effectiveness study suggests that use of fidaxomicin potentially results in better outcomes relative to oral vancomycin for initial treatment of hospitalized VAMC patients with CDIs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). We aimed to evaluate the potential health economic and clinical outcomes of four strategies for management of RCDI in IBD patients from the perspective of public health-care provider in Hong Kong. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was designed to simulate outcomes of adult IBD patients with first RCDI treated with vancomycin, vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab, fidaxomicin and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Model inputs were derived from literature and public data. Primary model outcomes were C. difficile infection (CDI)-related direct medical cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) loss. Base-case and sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Comparing to vancomycin, fidaxomicin and vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab, FMT saved 0.00318, 0.00149 and 0.00306 QALYs and reduced cost by USD3180, USD3790 and USD5514, respectively, in base-case analysis. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, FMT was cost-saving when comparing to vancomycin, fidaxomicin and vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab by USD3765 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3732-3798; P < 0.001), USD3854 (95%CI 3827-3883; P < 0.001) and USD6501 (95%CI 6465-6,536; P < 0.001), respectively. The QALYs saved by FMT (vs vancomycin) were 0.00386 QALYs (95%CI 0.00384-0.00388; P < 0.001), (vs fidaxomicin) 0.00179 QALYs (95%CI 0.00177-0.00180; P < 0.001) and (vs vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab) 0.00376 QALYs (95%CI 0.00374-0.00378; P < 0.001). FMT was found to save QALYs at lower cost in 99.3% (vs vancomycin), 99.7% (vs fidaxomicin) and 100.0% (vs vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab) of the 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS: FMT for IBD patients with RCDI appeared to save both direct medical cost and QALYs when comparing to vancomycin (with or without bezlotoxumab) and fidaxomicin.

Clostridioides difficile Infection: Update on Management.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection have recently been updated. Risk factors include recent exposure to health care facilities or antibiotics, especially clindamycin. C. difficile infection is characterized by a wide range of symptoms, from mild or moderate diarrhea to severe disease with pseudomembranous colitis, colonic ileus, toxic megacolon, sepsis, or death. C. difficile infection should be considered in patients who are not taking laxatives and have three or more episodes of unexplained, unformed stools in 24 hours. Testing in these patients should start with enzyme immunoassays for glutamate dehydrogenase and toxins A and B or nucleic acid amplification testing. In children older than 12 months, testing is recommended only for those with prolonged diarrhea and risk factors. Treatment depends on whether the episode is an initial vs. recurrent infection and on the severity of the infection based on white blood cell count, serum creatinine level, and other clinical signs and symptoms. For an initial episode of nonsevere C. difficile infection, oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin is recommended. Metronidazole is no longer recommended as first-line therapy for adults. Fecal microbiota transplantation is a reasonable treatment option with high cure rates in patients who have had multiple recurrent episodes and have received appropriate antibiotic therapy for at least three of the episodes. Good antibiotic stewardship is a key strategy to decrease rates of C. difficile infection. In routine or endemic settings, hands should be cleaned with either soap and water or an alcohol-based product, but during outbreaks soap and water is superior. The Infectious Diseases Society of America does not recommend the use of probiotics for prevention of C. difficile infection.

Fidaxomicina en el tratamiento de la infección por Clostridium difficile en el paciente oncohematológico / Fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in oncohematology patients

No disponible

Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in patients 60 years and older with Clostridium difficile infection: cost-effectiveness analysis in Spain.

The cost of treating Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Spain is substantial. Findings from the randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 EXTEND study showed that an extended-pulsed fidaxomicin (EPFX) regimen was associated with improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence of CDI versus vancomycin in patients aged 60 years and older. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of EPFX versus vancomycin for the treatment of CDI in patients aged 60 years and older from the perspective of the National Health System (NHS) in Spain. We used a Markov model with six health states and 1-year time horizon. Health resources, their unit costs and utilities were based on published sources. Key efficacy data and transition probabilities were obtained from the EXTEND study and published sources. A panel of Spanish clinical experts validated all model assumptions. In the analysis, 0.638 and 0.594 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient were obtained with EPFX and vancomycin, respectively, with a gain of 0.044 QALYs with EPFX. The cost per patient treated with EPFX and vancomycin was estimated to be €10,046 and €10,693, respectively, with a saving of €647 per patient treated with EPFX. For willingness-to-pay thresholds of €20,000, €25,000 and €30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that EPFX was the most cost-effective treatment was 99.3%, 99.5% and 99.9%, respectively. According to our economic model and the assumptions based on the Spanish NHS, EPFX is cost-effective compared with vancomycin for the first-line treatment of CDI in patients aged 60 years and older.

Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: EXTEND study subgroup analyses.

Poor outcomes following Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have been associated with advanced age, presence of cancer and C. difficile PCR-ribotype 027. The impact of baseline risk factors on clinical outcomes was evaluated using data from the EXTEND study, in which rate of sustained clinical cure (SCC) in the overall population was significantly higher with an extended-pulsed fidaxomicin (EPFX) regimen than with vancomycin. Patients aged ≥ 60 years received EPFX (fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily, days 1-5; once daily on alternate days, days 7-25) or vancomycin (125 mg four times daily, days 1-10). We analysed outcomes by advanced age, cancer diagnosis, CDI severity, prior CDI occurrence and infection with PCR-ribotype 027. The primary endpoint was SCC 30 days after end of treatment (EOT; clinical response at test-of-cure with no subsequent recurrence). SCC rates 30 days after EOT did not differ significantly between EPFX (124/177, 70.1%) and vancomycin (106/179, 59.2%) regardless of age, cancer diagnosis, CDI severity and prior CDI. In patients with PCR-ribotype 027, SCC rate 30 days after EOT was significantly higher with EPFX (20/25, 80%) than with vancomycin (9/22, 40.9%) (treatment difference, 39.1%; 95% CI, 13.2-64.9; P = 0.006). Subgroup analyses from the EXTEND study suggest that EPFX is efficacious as a potential treatment for CDI regardless of age, cancer diagnosis, infection with PCR-ribotype 027, CDI severity or prior CDI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02254967.

Clinical outcomes of fidaxomicin vs oral vancomycin in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) occurs after initial treatment in approximately 20%-30% of patients, regardless of therapy chosen. The objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of recurrent CDI treated with fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, propensity score-matched nationwide analysis of adult patients with first or second CDI recurrence prescribed fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin from any Veterans Affairs Medical Center between June 2011 and December 2015. The primary outcome was evidence of clinical failure or 90-day recurrence. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Univariate variables associated with failure or recurrence were identified among 65 fidaxomicin-treated episodes and 1065 vancomycin-treated episodes and placed into a multivariable logistic regression model. Propensity scores were calculated from this model; 195 vancomycin-treated episodes were matched by the next-nearest propensity score to 65 fidaxomicin-treated episodes. CDI failure or recurrence was similar between the two groups (18 of 65 [27.7%] fidaxomicin-treated episodes vs 42 of 195 [21.5%] vancomycin-treated episodes [P = 0.31]). Multivariate analysis demonstrated only baseline second recurrence episode, not choice of drug, as independently associated with failure or recurrence. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the combined outcome of clinical failure or 90-day recurrence between fidaxomicin and oral vancomycin in the treatment of first or second recurrent CDI.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of fidaxomicin in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and Clostridium difficile infection: an open-label Phase IIIb/IV study (PROFILE).

Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses an increased risk for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Fidaxomicin has demonstrated non-inferiority to vancomycin for initial clinical cure of CDI in patients without IBD; however, lack of data has caused concerns regarding potential systemic absorption of fidaxomicin in patients with IBD. Methods: The plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of fidaxomicin and its primary metabolite OP-1118 were evaluated in a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, Phase IIIb/IV study enrolling patients with active IBD and CDI. Patients received fidaxomicin, 200 mg twice daily for 10 days. The primary and secondary endpoints were, respectively, plasma and stool PK of fidaxomicin and OP-1118 on Days 1, 5 and 10 of treatment. Other secondary endpoints included safety of fidaxomicin treatment (assessed until Day 180). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02437591. Results: Median Tmax of fidaxomicin and OP-1118 for the PK analysis set (PKAS; 24 patients) was 1-2 h across Days 1, 5 and 10. Cmax ranges were 1.2-154 ng/mL for fidaxomicin and 4.7-555 ng/mL for OP-1118 across Days 1, 5 and 10 (PKAS). The ranges of concentrations in stool were 17.8-2170 µg/g for fidaxomicin and 0-1940 µg/g for OP-1118. Sixty percent (15/25) of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), none of which led to treatment discontinuation or death. Conclusions: Maximum fidaxomicin and OP-1118 plasma concentrations observed in this study population suggest no increase in absorption, compared with patients without IBD. Incidence of TEAEs was similar to previous Phase III trials, suggesting that fidaxomicin is comparatively well tolerated in patients with IBD.

Retrospective evaluation of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for treatment of Clostridium difficile infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a potential complication during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and no specific recommendations exist regarding treatment of CDI in allogeneic SCT patients. Use of metronidazole and oral vancomycin has been associated with clinical failure. Fidaxomicin has previously been found noninferior to the use of oral vancomycin for the treatment of CDI, and no studies have compared the use of oral vancomycin with fidaxomicin for the treatment of CDI in allogeneic SCT. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included 96 allogeneic SCT recipients who developed CDI within 100 days following transplantation. Participants were treated with oral vancomycin (n = 52) or fidaxomicin (n = 44). The primary outcome was clinical cure, defined as no need for further retreatment 2 days following completion of initial CDI treatment. Secondary outcomes were global cure, treatment failure, and recurrent disease. RESULTS: No differences in clinical cure were observed between patients receiving oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin (75% vs. 75%, p = 1.00). Secondary outcomes were similar between oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin in regards to global cure (66% vs. 67%, p = .508), treatment failure (28% vs. 27%, p = .571), and recurrent disease (7% vs. 5%, p = .747). In a subanalysis of individuals that developed acute graft-versus-host disease following CDI, the difference in mean onset of acute graft-versus-host disease was 21.03 days in the oral vancomycin group versus 32.88 days in the fidaxomicin group (p = .0031). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin are comparable options for CDI treatment in allogeneic SCT patients within 100 days following transplant.

Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness.

Objectives: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. Methods: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (£1356 versus £260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; £10 815 versus £11 459/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (£694 versus £1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost £53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. Conclusions: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients.

Probable fidaxomicin-induced pancytopenia.

PURPOSE: A case of pancytopenia in a patient receiving treatment with fidaxomicin for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is described. SUMMARY: A 33-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted to the hospital with a chief complaint of loose stools occurring approximately 7 times a day; she also reported fever, nausea, diffuse abdominal pain, and fatigue. The patient had a history of recurrent CDI, recurrent urinary tract infections, nephrolithiasis, chronic hepatitis C, and endometriosis. Her previous therapies for CDI included metronidazole, vancomycin, rifaximin, and fecal microbiota transplantation. On admission, she had a platelet count of 172,000 platelets/mm3, hemoglobin concentration of 11.1 g/dL, and white blood cell (WBC) count of 3,100 cells/mm3. Within 24 hours of the first dose of fidaxomicin and before the second dose, the patient's platelet count fell to 156,000 platelets/mm3, her hemoglobin concentration decreased to 9.9 g/dL, and her WBC count fell to 2,600 cells/mm3. Values for all 3 tests continued to decrease during the first few days of fidaxomicin therapy. One dose of filgrastim 300 µg was administered subcutaneously on day 6 in response to the pancytopenia, after which the platelet, hemoglobin, and WBC values stabilized for a day and then generally declined. Platelet, hemoglobin, and WBC values returned to normal within 3 days of the patient's last dose of fidaxomicin. Use of the Naranjo et al. adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable association (score of 6) between fidaxomicin and the patient's pancytopenia. CONCLUSION: A 33-year-old woman developed pancytopenia during a course of fidaxomicin therapy for CDI. Platelet, hemoglobin, and WBC values returned to normal within 3 days of the final fidaxomicin dose.

Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients at Increased Risk for Recurrence.

Background: Bezlotoxumab is a human monoclonal antibody against Clostridium difficile toxin B indicated to prevent C. difficile infection (CDI) recurrence (rCDI) in adults at high risk for rCDI. This post hoc analysis of pooled monocolonal antibodies for C.difficile therapy (MODIFY) I/II data assessed bezlotoxumab efficacy in participants with characteristics associated with increased risk for rCDI. Methods: The analysis population was the modified intent-to-treat population who received bezlotoxumab or placebo (n = 1554) by risk factors for rCDI that were prespecified in the statistical analysis plan: age ≥65 years, history of CDI, compromised immunity, severe CDI, and ribotype 027/078/244. The proportion of participants with rCDI in 12 weeks, fecal microbiota transplant procedures, 30-day all cause and CDI-associated hospital readmissions, and mortality at 30 and 90 days after randomization were presented. Results: The majority of enrolled participants (75.6%) had ≥1 risk factor; these participants were older and a higher proportion had comorbidities compared with participants with no risk factors. The proportion of placebo participants who experienced rCDI exceeded 30% for each risk factor compared with 20.9% among those without a risk factor, and the rCDI rate increased with the number of risk factors (1 risk factor: 31.3%; ≥3 risk factors: 46.1%). Bezlotoxumab reduced rCDI, fecal microbiota transplants, and CDI-associated 30-day readmissions in participants with risk factors for rCDI. Conclusions: The risk factors prespecified in the MODIFY statistical analysis plan are appropriate to identify patients at high risk for rCDI. While participants with ≥3 risk factors had the greatest reduction of rCDI with bezlotoxumab, those with 1 or 2 risk factors may also benefit. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01241552 (MODIFY I) and NCT01513239 (MODIFY II).

Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients 60 years and older (EXTEND): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection causes severe complications and frequently recurs. An extended-pulsed fidaxomicin regimen might facilitate sustained clinical cure by prolonging C difficile suppression and supporting gut microbiota recovery. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin with standard vancomycin. METHODS: In this randomised, controlled, open-label, superiority study, we recruited hospitalised adults aged 60 years and older with confirmed C difficile infection at 86 European hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive web response system to receive extended-pulsed fidaxomicin (200 mg oral tablets, twice daily on days 1-5, then once daily on alternate days on days 7-25) or vancomycin (125 mg oral capsules, four times daily on days 1-10), stratified by baseline C difficile infection severity, cancer presence, age (≥75 years vs <75 years), and number of previous C difficile infection occurrences. The primary endpoint was sustained clinical cure 30 days after end of treatment (day 55 for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin and day 40 for vancomycin), assessed in all randomised patients who met the inclusion criteria and received at least one dose of study medication (modified full analysis set). Adverse events were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02254967. FINDINGS: Between Nov 6, 2014, and May 5, 2016, 364 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive extended-pulsed fidaxomicin or vancomycin. 362 patients received at least one dose of study medication (181 in each group). 124 (70%) of 177 patients in the modified full analysis set receiving extended-pulsed fidaxomicin achieved sustained clinical cure 30 days after end of treatment, compared with 106 (59%) of 179 patients receiving vancomycin (difference 11% [95% CI 1·0-20·7], p=0·030; odds ratio 1·62 [95% CI 1·04-2·54]). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ between extended-pulsed fidaxomicin (121 [67%] of 181) and vancomycin (128 [71%] of 181) treatment arms. One death in the vancomycin arm was considered by the investigator to be related to study drug. INTERPRETATION: Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was superior to standard-dose vancomycin for sustained cure of C difficile infection, and, to our knowledge, extended-pulsed fidaxomicin recurrence rates in this study are the lowest observed in a randomised clinical trial of antibiotic treatment for C difficile infection. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma, Inc.

Outcomes With Fidaxomicin Therapy in Clostridium difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Fidaxomicin is a new antibiotic used to treat Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Given limited clinical experience with fidaxomicin, we assessed outcomes in a diverse cohort of patients with CDI treated with fidaxomicin. STUDY: All CDI cases treated with fidaxomicin at 3 referral centers over a 4-year period were included. Response was defined as resolution of diarrhea and recurrence was defined by recurrence of CDI within 8 weeks of the end of treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 81 patients (median age 55.9 y; 53% female; 26% with inflammatory bowel disease) were included. Response occurred in 90%. Responders had fewer prior CDI episodes [median 1 (range, 0 to 8)] than nonresponders [median 2.5 (range, 1 to 8)], P=0.01. Response after a first CDI episode was 100%, 96% after 1 prior episode, and 82% after 2 or more, P=0.02. Recurrence occurred in 19%. Patients without recurrence had fewer prior episodes of CDI [median 1 (range, 0 to 6)] than patients who recurred [median 2 (range, 1 to 8)], P=0.005. Recurrence after a first episode was 0%, 23% after 1 prior episode, and 29% after 2 or more, P=0.005. All patients with inflammatory bowel disease responded either with improvement of symptoms or a negative C. difficile test; 19% recurred. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with a first CDI episode treated with fidaxomicin responded with no recurrences. Patients with prior CDI episodes were less likely to respond (especially with more than 1 prior episode) and more likely to recur, suggesting a greater clinical benefit of fidaxomicin earlier in the course of CDI.

Manejo actualizado de la diarrea asociada a Clostridium difficile / Updated management of diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile

The management of Clostridium difficile (CD) infection has changed in recent years. The latest clinical guidelines and systematic reviews suggest the use of vancomycin orally as the first line of treatment regardless the severity of the crisis (main difference compared to previous recommendations), this is due to changes in its epidemiology, the decrease in effectiveness and the increase of recurrences with the use of metronidazole, particularly in severe crisis. In addition, the use of new agents such as fidaxomicin has been approved. Fulminant crisis require an aggressive management combining oral treatment, enemas and intravenous therapy in addition to a collaborative management with the surgery team. With respect to recurrences, the use of vancomycin in pulses and with extended therapy schemes is suggested; fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is also an attractive therapy for patients with multiple recurrences. The following is a summary of the latest recommendations and available evidence regarding the management of CD infection in the most frequent situations, both in first crisis and in its recurrences.

El manejo de la infección por Clostridium difficile (CD) ha tenido modificaciones los últimos años. Las últimas guías clínicas y revisiones sistemáticas sugieren el uso de vancomicina vía oral como primera línea de tratamiento independiente de la severidad de la crisis (diferencia principal con recomendaciones previas), esto debido a cambios en su epidemiología, la disminución de la efectividad y al aumento de las recurrencias con el uso de metronidazol, particularmente en crisis severas. Además, han sido aprobados el uso de nuevos agentes como la fidaxomicina. Las crisis de carácter fulminante requieren un manejo agresivo combinando terapia oral, vía enemas e intravenosa, además de un manejo en conjunto con el equipo de cirugía. Respecto a las recurrencias se sugiere el uso de vancomicina en pulsos y con esquemas de terapia extendida siendo además, el trasplante de microbiota fecal (FMT) una terapia atractiva para pacientes con múltiples recurrencias. A continuación se resumen las últimas recomendaciones y evidencia disponible respecto del manejo de la infección por CD en las situaciones más frecuentes, tanto en la primera crisis como en sus recurrencias.